Opinion Polls: Delphi's Polling Place
Hosted by Showtalk
Opinion polls on all subjects. Opinions? Heck yes, we have opinions - but we're *always* nice about it, even when ours are diametrically opposed to yours. Register your vote today!
- 5188
MEMBERS - 140443
MESSAGES - 34
POSTS TODAY
Discussions
Fair Elections/Voter Fraud The Serious You: How Current Events Affect You
Started 11/11/21 by WALTER784; 583066 views.
Staff
From: WALTER784
Mar-28
He didn't lose votes, he had his votes stolen from him just like with Trump.
Initially, he was ahead of Schiff, then, Schiff seems to pick up some kind of lead and starts to do better than him. Then, all of a sudden, he loses numerous votes but then picks up more votes again and at one point is doing better than Schiff, then Schiff gets a massive increase of votes and his votes decrease yet again. And this is done multiple times in the two videoclips in the link above. One on Rumble and one on X (Twitter).
The final count was 1,247,723 or 33.2 percent for Schiff and 1,220,683 or 32.5 percent for Garvey... Schiff beat him by 27,040 votes.
However, at one point, Garvey had 1,744,486 votes... but he ended up losing to Schiff with only 1,247,723 votes.
How Now did Garvey's vote count drop from 1,744,486 to 1,247,723? That's a loss of 496,763 votes!
Vote counts never ever drop.
Example: You and I are in a dead heat vote as to who will be the host of this forum. (* CHUCKLE *)
Initially, I was at 38 votes and you had 32 votes. (I was ahead by 6)
Then, 15 minutes later, I had 43 votes (+5) and you had 39 votes (+7). (I was ahead by 4)
15 minutes later, I had 47 votes (+4) and you had 49 votes (+10). (You're ahead by 2)
15 minutes later, I had 42 votes (-5) and you had 53 votes (+4). (You win by 9 points)
Notice the red (-5) above? How did my vote count which was at 47 drop to 42?
Vote counts should never go down.
But you can see on both the Rumble and X videoclips, that Garvey's numbers drop by tens of thousands on multiple instances.
Watch the videoclip... you can see it in real time that Garvey's numbers drop several times, but Schiff's numbers don't drop at all. And also notice, that every time Schiff goes back up to the number 1 spot, within 1 or 2 seconds afterwards, Garvey's numbers drop again. And that's repeated over and over and over.
FWIW
- Edited March 28, 2024 10:10 pm by WALTER784
Staff
From: WALTER784
Mar-28
Will Republicans Actually Protect the Election This Year, or Will They Let Democrats Meddle to Their Heart’s Content Again?
BY FRED LUCAS
March 14, 2024
The Biden administration appears poised to put the government’s thumb on the scale in the 2024 election, House Republicans say.
The administration’s lack of transparency about implementing President Joe Biden’s executive order for federal agencies to help get out the vote—combined with a warning from Attorney General Merrick Garland—has sparked some concern among lawmakers.
“You just saw Merrick Garland saying voter ID is disenfranchising people,” Rep. Claudia Tenney, R-N.Y., co-chairman of the House Election Integrity Caucus, told The Daily Signal. “The statistics don’t bear that out. It’s like 85% of people across all demographics support voter ID.”
Earlier this month, Garland criticized voter ID laws and other election security measures as “discriminatory, burdensome, and unnecessary.”
“One of the first things I did as attorney general was to double the number of lawyers in the Voting Section of the Civil Rights Division,” Garland said in a March 3 speech in Selma, Alabama. “That is why we are challenging efforts by states and jurisdictions to implement discriminatory, burdensome, and unnecessary restrictions on access to the ballot, including those related to mail-in voting, the use of drop boxes, and voter ID requirements.”
As explained in my book “The Myth of Voter Suppression,” several studies have shown that voter ID laws don’t suppress voting.
Zelenko
A 2019 study by the National Bureau of Economic Research, based on turnout data from 2008 to 2018, said voter ID laws “have no negative effect on registration or turnout, overall or for any group defined by race, gender, age, or party affiliation.”
A 2023 study, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, found that voter ID laws actually “produced a Democratic advantage, which weakened to near zero after 2012.” It added that voter ID laws have “negligible average effects.”
Garland’s recent comments seemed aimed at intimidation during the 2024 election cycle, where it looks like Biden again will face Donald Trump, Tenney said.
“We’ve had just an unprecedented amount of changes in laws in terms of election integrity,” Tenney said, referring to New York and other Democrat-controlled states. She added: “I’m trying to make voting great again. I’m trying to make it sacred.”
Americans should be able to trust elections, said Rep. Mary Miller, R-Ill.
“It’s interesting we think we are so sophisticated around the world and we are faltering in this area,” Miller told The Daily Signal. “People need to feel that their vote matters. We need to have voter ID. You cannot even pay cash for a hotel room without coming up with … ID. This is ridiculous.”
Voter ID laws are commonplace in almost every European country, while mail-in voting is far more restricted than in the United States.
“You want legitimate voters to make sure that everybody has a vote that legally should have a vote,” Rep. Beth Van Duyne, R-Texas, told The Daily Signal. “Otherwise, you are diluting the voice of your constituency.”
Van Duyne said she does worry about Biden’s Executive Order 14019, which requires federal agencies to establish plans and partner with nonprofit organizations to boost voting.
“The Constitution clearly defines states as maintaining control of their election laws,” Van Duyne said. “Trying to stick the camel’s nose under the tent is a mistake. I do not want D.C. coming in and telling Texas how to conduct its elections.”
Although Biden administration agencies have been slow to release information voluntarily, responses to requests for public records have shown agencies are partnering with transparently liberal organizations such as Demos, the Brennan Center for Justice, the American Civil Liberties Union, and similar groups.
“I don’t have a problem with voters having access to vote. That’s the American way. I do have a problem with agencies
...[Message truncated]
Staff
From: WALTER784
Mar-29
Showtalk said...
How did he lose votes?
Remember the 2021 Newsom recall? Similar happened when 351,000 votes to recall him just disappeared on live on CCN TV as they were broadcasting it? Watch the Rumble videoclip in the link below.
WATCH: 351,000 “Yes” Votes Disappear from Totals in Newsom Recall Election LIVE ON CNN (VIDEO)
By Jim Hoft
Sep. 15, 2021 11:10 am
Last night on CNN 351,000 “Yes” votes disappeared in an instant during live coverage of the Newsom Recall Election in California.
This happened live on CNN last night.
This happened during the 2020 presidential election too.
Notice, it ALWAYS only affects Trump supporters and Republicans.
Must be a coincidence, right?
FWIW
Staff
From: WALTER784
Mar-29
It’s The Perfect Storm: Drivers Licenses for Illegals + Noncitizens Voting + Mail-in Ballots + Private Funding of Elections + Partisan Hack SOSs
By Patty McMurray
Mar. 17, 2024 6:30 pm
The Perfect Storm Explained: Drivers Licenses for Illegals + Noncitizen Voting + Mail-in Ballots + Private Funding of Elections + Partisan Hack SOSs
Does undocumented immigrant mean illegal alien?
If you hesitated before answering yes, you are a victim of progressive doublespeak. Undocumented immigrants are illegal aliens. Noncitizens, whether here legally or illegally, are not allowed to vote in our nation’s elections. It’s a felony for noncitizens to vote, and the U.S. and state constitutions clearly prohibit foreigners from voting. Even so, “The Department of Justice appears to be using taxpayer dollars to have jails and the U.S. Marshals Service encourage incarcerated felons and noncitizens to register to vote,” stated a letter to the DOJ from Mississippi’s leading election official, Secretary of State Michael Watson (R).
Secretary Watson’s letter, dated March 6, to U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland also said,
“It is quite shocking, in the midst of a crisis at our southern border and an unprecedented crime wave, that the Biden administration has chosen to expend tax dollars and vital law enforcement resources on a program that risks bloating state voter rolls with ineligible and non-citizen voters.”
The Federalist connected the dots to President Biden’s Executive Order 14019, and its headline read, “DOJ Is Using Bidenbucks To Encourage Illegals And Felons To Vote, Says Mississippi Secretary Of State.” The EO, issued in March 2021, ordered “hundreds of federal agencies to interfere in state and local election administration by using U.S. taxpayer money to boost voter registration and get-out-the-vote activities,” Federalist author Shawn Fleetwood wrote.
“Our understanding is that everyone in the Marshals’ custody is given a form advising them of their right to register and vote,” Secretary Watson’s letter said, according to Fox News.
“Providing ineligible non-citizens with information on how to register to vote undoubtedly encourages them to illegally register to vote, exposing them to legal jeopardy beyond their immigration status.”
To any wishful thinker who would like to attribute the consequences of Biden’s EO and Governor Gretchen Whitmer’s subsequent statewide EO to ignorance or poor judgment: Think again. According to an article in the Midwesterner, an illegal group claims credit for flipping the Michigan state House, and as a payoff, the party in power will seek to approve driver’s licenses for illegal aliens.
Buried deep in President Biden’s State of the Union Address, he touched on the border crisis and referred to the alleged brutal killer of Laken Riley as an “illegal.” Later, the president expressed regret for his choice of words. “I shouldn’t have said ‘illegal.’ It’s undocumented.”
Illegal, undocumented. Potato, potato.
Why the euphemism?
Words matter. The phrase, illegal alien, speaks for itself. No one of sound mind would think that illegal aliens should vote in our elections. Undocumented immigrants well, an apolitical person might falsely assume undocumented immigrants are simply missing some papers. We all can relate to being held hostage by some puffed-up bureaucrat demanding useless paperwork. (Try opening a U.S. Post Office box if you’re unfamiliar with this blood-pressure-spiking sensation.)
It’s about money, power…and ballots.
Vivek Ramaswamy attributed the law-breaking to a deliberate and coordinated effort to change the electorate to win elections. During a March 7 interview with Laura Ingraham at Fox News, the former presidential candidate said,
“In principle, election integrity, voter ID at the ballot box, and the issue of illegal immigration or border security are two separate issues. But what is remarkable is that the very people who favor porous borders or poor border security are also the ones who favor lowered requirements for voting.”
Vivek pointed out, “Election integrity and illegal immigration have become intertwined” and are “intimately linked….It’s also a long-run play….No one voted for this.”
...[Message truncated]
Staff
From: WALTER784
Mar-29
JUST IN: Kari Lake and Mark Finchem Take Lawsuit to Ban Voting Machines to The US Supreme Court with New Allegations of Illegal Machine Certification
By Jordan Conradson
Mar. 15, 2024 5:00 pm
Kari Lake and Mark Finchem appealed their lawsuit to ban the use of electronic voting machines to the United States Supreme Court on Thursday.
This comes after the 2022 election, where 60% of the voting machines were reportedly programmed to fail on election day, causing mass voter disenfranchisement and up to four-hour-long lines for Republican in-person voters.
The filing includes “new allegations,” some of which were previously mentioned in Kari Lake’s lawsuit to overturn the stolen election, including:
First, Maricopa did not conduct the required L&A testing, on which the district court relied to find the risk of election interference speculative.
Second, Maricopa did not use certified software, on which the district court relied to find the risk of election interference speculative.
Third, Maricopa used software that made all passwords needed to control Maricopa elections available to anyone with physical or remote access, which supports petitioners’ allegations and evidence that past elections were manipulated.
Fourth, altering election software without the Arizona Secretary of State’s approval is criminal act under Arizona law, A.R.S. §§16-449(A), 16- 452(C), 16-1009, 16-1004(B), 16-1010, thereby evaporating presumptions in their favor under Arizona law. See note 5, infra (Arizona’s “bursting bubble” theory of nonstatutory presumptions).
Fifth, Maricopa’s officials misrepresented their compliance with Arizona election law (e.g., L&A testing, certified software), which negates any presumptions in their favor under Arizona law. See note 5, infra (Arizona’s “bursting bubble” theory of nonstatutory presumptions).
Sixth, Maricopa officials abdicated control over the complex election systems to embedded private Dominion employees who lack any presumption of regularity under Arizona law. See note 4, infra.
The Gateway Pundit previously reported on these claims and video evidence that Maricopa County conducted secret reprogramming of the machines on October 14 through 18 after the Secretary of State’s October 11 Logic and Accuracy testing without notifying the Secretary of State for required additional testing.
“This litigation offers the opportunity to address critical faults in election infrastructure before the 2024 election,” the attorneys write in the 38-page filing to the Nation’s highest court.
Kari Lake is the Trump-Endorsed US Senate Candidate in the GOP Primary, where she leads by far and is on course to face Democrat Ruben Gallego in November.
Mark Finchem is running for Arizona State Senate in Arizona’s Legislative District 1 with President Trump’s Endorsement.
District 1 voters can sign Finchem’s candidate petition here:
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed Lake and Finchem’s lawsuit on October 16, 2023, claiming that Lake and Finchem did not have standing and that they “failed to establish that a future injury was either imminent or substantially likely to occur.”
Attorneys for Lake and Finchem argue to the Supreme Court that “Petitioners have suffered and still suffer particularized, concrete injuries from Maricopa’s unlawful election policies and execution. Moreover, because petitioners suffer these concrete injuries, they also have standing to challenge procedural injuries from procedural violations of election law. See Summers, 555 U.S. at 496; Section I.A.2, infra. Significantly, these injuries persist as to future elections, even if this case became moot as to the 2022 election.”
Previously, Ninth District Judge John Tuchi, the same federal judge who ruled that Maricopa County was justified in discriminating against TGP reporter Jordan Conradson and thwarting his First Amendment rights as a reporter to access the County’s press room after the 2022 election disaster, sanctioned Lake and Finchem’s attorneys over their effort to ban voting machines before the 2022 election. This was even after 60% of voting machines failed to tabulate Republican in-person votes on election day in 2022. In fact, Tuchi waited months from July 18, 2022, until December 1, 2022–after the rigged midterm election–to sanction La
...[Message truncated]
Staff
From: WALTER784
Mar-31
Ohio Volunteers Uncover Massive Irregularities in Voter Database
By Guest Contributor Jack Gleason
Mar. 25, 2024 11:20 am
In the spring of 2021, volunteer investigators from Ohio acquired publicly available voter data for all 88 counties and started their analysis. Over the next year the researchers found hundreds of thousands of records in their state’s voter rolls with irregular data for which they couldn’t identify consistent explanations, no matter who they asked.
In late summer of 2022, they reached out to Marly Hornik, co–leader of New York Citizens Audit, whose team had identified similar inaccuracies in the New York State data.
In 2023, Hornik and Harry Haury, an expert in cybercrime and election law, founded United Sovereign Americans and developed a legal strategy for securing the validity of the 2024 election based on federal civil rights law and Supreme Court precedent, which established for election officials that ignorance of the law is no excuse. “Congress seeks… to guard the election of members of Congress against any possible unfairness by compelling, under its pains and penalties, everyone concerned in holding the election to a strict and scrupulous observance of every duty devolved upon him while so engaged… The evil intent consists in disobedience to the law.” In re Coy, 127 U.S. 731 (1888).
The National Voter Registration Act of 1993 requires election rolls to be accurate. The Ohio team had collected more than a million pieces of evidence of apparent violations of law that called into serious question the accuracy of Ohio’s statewide voter roll database at the time of the 2022 general election and its subsequent certification.
The 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution stipulates that only legally qualified voters may vote. The Ohio team uncovered evidence that thousands of voters in Ohio had apparently registered before they were born!
Hornik soon invited the Ohio researchers to join United Sovereign Americans and shared more of their data investigation skills and litigation strategies. As a result, the Ohio team, in conjunction with USA, has been able to conduct a peer-reviewed audit of the state’s voter rolls at the time of the 2022 Ohio election and has prepared a report that summarizes the issues they encountered.
The day after certification in 2022, the Ohio statewide voter roll database showed:
58,209 resided in an apartment or in a mobile home lot but had no unit number as required on their voter registration application to ensure proper delivery of mail, including mail-in ballot material.
4,143 were older than the oldest person in the U.S. at the time or were too young to legally register.
6,348 had a date of birth that was different in 2022 than it was in 2020.
253,486 voters supposedly registered on January 1st, 84,221 voters registered on another Federal holiday and 201,693 voters registered on Sunday — all times when Ohio boards of elections and state offices are closed.
120,094 had registration dates in the 2022 state voter file that were earlier than their registration date in the 2020 file. 59,025 people were listed as registering to vote before they were born.
243,583 had state identification numbers that had changed since 2020, even though federal laws require each voter be issued “a unique state identifier.” 34,233 had 2 to 5 registration records with different state identification numbers, making it possible for them to vote more than once.
Federal law governing elections specifies that the error rate in Ohio’s 2022 election allowed a mere 34 errors. Instead, the election in Ohio had been certified despite 713,296 apparent voting violations.
In addition to federal laws cited above, there’s also the law of common sense. In elections, the number of votes counted must equal the number of voters who voted.
On December 10, 2022 — 11 days after the Ohio canvass officially concluded and one day after the election was certified as accurate and compliant — the number of votes reportedly cast (4,201,368), and the number of records identified in the state’s official list of legally registered voters as having voted (3,039,289) differed by more than a million. In fact, the day after certification, 15 counties had each updated fewer than 10 names to the state’s voter history. Four hadn’t updated any.
On January 19, 2024, the Ohio team submitted a written report to Frank
...[Message truncated]
Staff
From: WALTER784
Mar-31
Our Invisible Chains, Our Stolen Vote
ELIZABETH NICKSON
MAR 16, 2024
The machines. Dominion has sued so many people they have crushed discussion to nothing. But the machines are everything and it is how they steal every election, everywhere. And it’s not just Dominion, it’s all of them, ES&S, Smartmatic. They are linked in a network where people, thousands of them, work inserting votes here, eliminating votes there, figuring out how many more votes they need for someone to win, and when to trigger the mules in early voting. They know to the minute when to summon the truckloads of ballots into the warehouse the night of the election. The operators are connected to the electronic poll books, like iPads, 117,000 of them, used by the people who check you into the voting process and the programs ‘talk’ to the poll book and machines all day long.
No one in Canada is looking at stolen elections. Ours are “secure”. Few outlets mention stolen elections in the U.K., Ireland, France, Germany, Spain. But even if they use paper ballots on one day voting only, if you feed your vote into a tabulating machine, that vote is not secure. Why does Congress have a 25% approval rating and yet get reelected? The tabulating machines.
My think tank chief dismissed my question of whether anyone is looking at stolen votes in Canada. My American publisher dismissed my question, saying election fraud is dead as an issue. Someone else I write for announced that no one writing for him could say that the election was stolen.
I love and respect you all, but you are dead wrong. Not just the 2020 election was stolen, but all of them are stolen. The dog catcher vote is stolen. The county attorney vote is stolen. One of our trustees stole her vote, in my opinion, lying about her intentions, and reversed herself via dithering the morning after her election. I woke up in the middle of the night last night, gripped by terror, because this yanks the rug out from all of us. Wherever they want to insert a candidate, they do, within the machines, in real time. That’s why the world is in a furor. Why millions march on the street in Spain and Brazil. They know they didn’t vote for these malignant clowns. That’s why Trudeau/Macron/Rishi can be loathed beyond measure and yet still swaggering.
Opinions vary but the plurality falls on it being done out of a campus in China, one of the several ten thousand strong ‘universities’, who do nothing but hack American tech. They communicate directly with the machines into which you slide your vote. The machines can fill out blanks in the ballot – there is a printer in that machine - and they, the operators of the machine, can turn on and off crucial functions. They can turn off the record of their programming, erase it so that you can’t find out what happened, no trace, no logging of activities. A user with a password can erase his activity.
I am going to walk carefully here. I am obscure, but people who know far more about the evil in our world, have cautioned me, and people who pick away at this enduring question are systematically harassed and ruined. But, given that I was lawyered for years for pieces I wrote, I think I can feel my way through safely. This is my opinion. And the opinion of ten thousand others. It is based on data placed in evidence in court cases, subpoenaed records, and testimony from hundreds of experts. There is more data on this than you can imagine. There are several reliable films about the 2020 election and several books. I’ve watched or read them all.
When I was at graduate school, I floundered because it was all math. I’d failed first year math at McGill, earning a 0 in the Christmas exam. Of course I had spent the term flirting with boys; nevertheless, numeracy didn’t come easy. Graphs, charts, algorithms, statistics, accounting, micro, macro and labor economics. Bureaucratic law and regulation. Contract law. Management. I thank my stars I toughed it out because I know no other writer who writes for the general reader with that foundation. Most like me are shrieking alarm on Zero Hedge or trying to stay calm at a think tank. Law is more suited to journalism and there are many lawyers who write and write well. Meghan Kelly is an example of a successful journalist, her authority dependent on her law degree.
But if you don’t understand logarithms, stats, higher math, the rule of large numbers, surveying, management and the digital world, you cannot interpret what is really going on. You need that fine-tuned, detailed, profoundly logical part of your mind to get at it and those skills have to be trained. No judge and very few lawyers understand what really happened because there is a massive gap in their skill set. Presented with this evidence, their minds blur. Hard to confess a blurred mind, so default to the consensus decision. That definitely happened.
I was a freak at MBA school. My hair was bleached white with two inch dark roots. I looked by turns lost or panicked. The professors had n
...[Message truncated]
Host
From: Showtalk
Mar-31
That is what I want to know. There are a lot of squishy Republicans out there.
Host
From: Showtalk
Mar-31
We know the recall was rigged. I don’t know anyone on either side who was for Newsom staying in office.
TOP